ONCE UPON A TIME IN THE WEST (SERGIO LEONE, 1968): This post is a bit on the longer side, but it’s without a doubt one of the most detailed analyses you will find. Please note that www.PabloPicasso.org is a private website, unaffiliated with Pablo Picasso or his representatives. Small block chevy head castings; Casting # Combustion Chamber size CCs Intake valve Exhaust valve Production Years Misc Engine; 10033867: 62cc: 2.02: 1.60: over the. Murder of a Vietcong by Saigon Police Chief, 1. Nordland - I'm not arguing for the middle and my equivalency is not false. I'm capable of assessing the facts of the matter or what I know of them, with what I know of the law of land warfare - as taught to me in my basic and trade training as a member of the Australian Regular Army and what I later learned of legal reasoning in Legal Studies. But I've also been an amateur military historian for most of my life and remember the cameraderie and the strength of the psychological bonding of members of arms corps - I understand what the common experiences, both the training and the battlefield does to a person. And I know my own psychology and values well enough to know that I probably would have ignored the laws or land warfare and done the same thing. It's possible to know that something you are going to do is wrong and do it anyway. It's possible to talk about the abstract, legalistics rights and wrongs of something and to know that you would not obey those laws in some situation. That's called honesty. I'm not equivocating. I'm making two very clear statements. The execution was murder. I would likely have done the same. You'll have to explain the logical fallacies, and explain what you think any analogy I have made is false, then you'll have to say which one and again explain why. You've made some leaps in logic yourself and some false claims. That the VC may have been guilty of a war crime but it is impossible to know. You can't know until the facts have been established by a duly constituted court. Until that point, the VC was at best accused. The fact that someone is accused of a crime does not give anyone with a gun an arbitrary right to execute them. Further more there's a possibility VC may have been found to be an unlawful combatant if he had of been taken before a competent tribunal. But he was not found to be so by a competent tribunal which is the standard required under law. Some arbitary person can not just make that judgement and act upon it, least of all a senior officer acting on his own on the battlefield - for moral as well as legal reasons. Until a competent tribunal makes that judgement the combatant must be treated as a prisoner of war. That means you can't shoot him, after he was stopped shooting at you. Again if you've seen any of the movie footage you'll know the VC was unarmed and not resisting or attacking the party who shot him. The VC was not a convicted criminal. That doesn't matter too much, because the film. Used Engines For Sale We specialize in used engines of all kinds including American, Domestic, Japanese, German and foreign engines. Our catalog includes over 400. He had not been tried, convicted or sentenced. He'd been captured bound and shot. That's what makes the execution a murder. The fact he had not been tried or sentenced by a court. No officer has the legal power to execute anybody without trial. The VC officer qualified for the protections of the Geneva Conventions. You note the VC officer was detained (unarmed, bound, outnumbered by armed guards and complying with their instructions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2017
Categories |